Monday, October 31, 2011

Week 6 Submission

Equal Area Map Projections


Distance from Washington D.C. to Kabul: 12,103.63649 Kilometers



Distance from Washington D.C. to Kabul: 12,915.856858 Kilometers













Equidistant Map Projections


Distance from Washington D.C. to Kabul: 11,373.808411 Kilometers



Distance from Washington D.C. to Kabul: 8,145.837389 Kilometers













Conformal Map Projections


Distance from Washington D.C. to Kabul: 16,273.910536 Kilometers



Distance from Washington D.C. to Kabul: 15,897.194586 Kilometers







Map projections are very useful tools for displaying the whole world on paper. The truth is that there is no perfect map projection. Each projection is distorted in some way, which makes choosing the right map projection hard. The way to choose the right map projection is to identify what you are trying to accomplish with your map and to choose the one that best fits your purpose. Map projections are significant because by looking at the map projection that someone chooses, you can identify their biases and potential goals. For example, if someone uses a Mercator projection, they are probably not located near the Equator because this particular projection makes the higher latitudes seem much larger than they actually are.

During this week’s lab, we needed to create two maps from three different map categories: equal area, equidistant, and conformal map projections. For the equal area map projections, I used the World Eckert V and World Eckert VI. These maps are nearly identical. They are wonderful because they keep the correct area of all the land masses. These maps are especially important in geography because the sizes of continents are very important in this field. When studying climate or populations, it is vitally important to have the correct size for each land mass.

The second map projection type I looked at was equidistant map projections. For this projection, I chose World Equidistant Conic and Word Equidistant Cylindrical map projections. These projections have uniform distances from the center of the projection to any other place on the map. These projections are important because sometimes your main objective in a map might be preserving the distance between two points. However, this projection does not keep all area equal, just the few parts of the map that you are trying to preserve.

The third map projection type I looked at was conformal map projections. For this projection type, I chose Mercator and Stereographic map projections. The Mercator map is the projection that is used mostly in American schools. They are used so often because they make the United States look much bigger than it should be compared to countries closer to the equator. They are also useful because all conformal map projections preserve the correct angles. However, they greatly distort the sizes of the land masses. These maps are easy to use because all the meridians and parallels are connected at right angles.

Monday, October 10, 2011

Week 3 Lab, My Summer Travels Mashup Map


View Summer Travels in a larger map

Neography is an incredibly powerful tool that is being used more all the time. Even the most technically unsavvy people are realizing that they too can participate in neography, mostly through the portal of mashups. This is wonderful because now everyone is a geographer and is motivated to learn more about maps and geography. The potential of neography is endless; while the platform is a software, usually by a big company like Google, it is completely user-driven. Without the users, there is no neography. As more people become interested in the current neography platforms, the demand for new platforms will arise, thus growing even larger.
The problem with neography is that it creates a very large potential for false information. A similar comparison could be drawn with Wikipedia, which lets users create and edit pages about any topic. However, Wikipedia has a very large staff of people closely monitoring user edits, so it is not a very good comparison. With neography, there are simply too many mashups and other websites that it is impossible to monitor everything. When a person is trying to look up something online, there is a very high possibility that they will run into misinformation. This can be very discouraging and frustrating to people, which could drive them away from the concept of neography.

Sunday, October 9, 2011

Geo 7 Lab 2

1. Beverly Hills Quadrangle
2. Canoga Park, Van Nuys, Burbank, Topanga, Hollywood, Venice, Inglewood
3. 1966
4. Horizontal: 1927, Vertical 1929
5. 1:24,000
6. A. 1,200 meters
    B. 1.89393939 miles
    C. 2.64 inches
     D. 12.5 centimeters
 7. 20 feet
8. A. 34° 4' 28.75" N (34.074477), -118° 26' 20.86" W (-118.439146)
     B. 34°, 0', 38" N (34.007524) , 118°, 29', 58" W (-118.49986)
     C. 34° 5' 50.96" N (34.102272), -118° 24' 46.36" W (-118.41291)
9. A. 580 feet, 178.784 meters
     B. 140 feet, 42.672 meters
     C. 700 feet, 213.36 meters
10. Zone 11
11. 3763 Northing, 36
12. 1 square kilometer 
13. (See image)
14. 14 degrees
15. North to South
16.  (See images)